Análisis Aerodinámico de la Aeronave USB aero Mediante Dinámica de Fluidos Computacional

Juan Gabriel Sanchez Ocampo, Jordy Francisco Tamayo Andrade, Sergio Andres Lopez Aragon, Rafael Mauricio Cerpa

Abstract


The present research study presents the results of the aerodynamic analysis of a USB AERO aircraft using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in operational conditions of cruise flight at an angle of attack of  3.5 degrees. The ANSYS FLUENT computational tool was used, with which the lift, drag and longitudinal momentum coefficients were determined. Additionally, the aircraft was analyzed at different angles of attack in order to determine aerodynamic characteristics such as the highest lift coefficient and the loss angle, in addition to establishing the maximum aerodynamic efficiency.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Trapp,L.G. & Argentieri,H.G (2010). Evaluation of nacelle drag using computational fluid dynamics. Journal of aerospace technology and management JATM, 145-153. Recuperado de http://www.jatm.com.br/papers/vol2_n2/JATMv2n2_p145153_Evaluation_of_nacelle_drag_using_Computational_Fluid_Dynamics.pdf

Johnson, F., Tinoco, E., & Yu, J. (2003). Thirty Years of Development and Application of CFD at Boeing Commercial Airplanes. 16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference. Seattle, EU. Recuperado de http://servidor.demec.ufpr.br/disciplinas/TM257/Bibliografia/Johnson_et_al_2005.pdf

Puerto, D., & Lopez, D. (2010). CFD simulación del flujo alrededor de un perfil alar naca 4415 con un flap tipo gurney. Mecánica Computacional Vol XXIX, 5021-5042. Buenos Aires, Argentina. Recuperado de http://www.cimec.org.ar/ojs/index.php/mc/article/viewFile/3360/3279

Bernal, A., & Orrego, S. (2007). Diseño del ala para un vehiculo aereo no tripulado. Congreso Latinoamericano en Aeronáutica, 206. Medellin, Colombia. Recuperado de https://repository.eafit.edu.co/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10784/4450/AndresBernal_SantiagoOrrego_2007.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

Gomez, A., & Zuñiga, A. (2008). Estudio Aerodinámico Del Modelo De Avión X-001 FAC, Universidad de San Buenaventura, Bogotá, Colombia.

A. R., G. M., & J. R. (2013). Análsis Aerodinámico del Ala del Navigator X - 2.1 Mediante un Software de Dinámica de Fluidos Computacional. Bogotá, D.C.

W. B., & A. G. (2012). Análsis Aerodinámico del Navigator X - 2 en CFD. Bogotá, D.C.

Raymer, D. (1992). Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach. Washington, D.C: AIAA education series.

IP, S. (13 de 7 de 2017). sharcnet ansys 17. Obtenido de sharcnet ansys 17: https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Ansys/17.0/en-us/help/flu_ug/flu_ug_mesh_quality.html

Bakker, A. (13 de 7 de 2017). Bakker.or. Obtenido de BAkker.org: http://www.bakker.org/dartmouth06/engs150/07-mesh.pdf

Kuron, M. (16 de Julio de 2017). 3 Criteria for Assesing CFD Convergence . Obtenido de www.enginnering.com/CFD

Almohammadi., K. (2013). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) mesh independency techniques. Leeds,England: University of Leeds.

Cengel, Y., & Cimbala, J. (2012). Mecánica de Fluidos. Fundamentos y Aplicaciones. México D.F: The McGraw-Hill Companies




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18180/tecciencia.28.5

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 TECCIENCIA